29Oct/092
Friedman, Kristof and Hoh on Afghanistan
Tom Friedman and Nick Kristof both argue against a troop increase. And I'm inclined to agree--an increase in military presence isn't guaranteed (by any means) to quell the violence. Kristof argues instead for more schools--for the cost of one soldier, we could build 20 schools.
Also, in case you didn't catch it, read an online chat with Matthew Hoh, who was the first U.S. official known to resign over the war in Afghanistan.
UPDATE: Here's Jim Wallis's (my boss) statement on Afghanistan.
Tagged as: afghanistan, barack obama, matthew hoh, nicholas kristof, thomas friedman, troops
2 Comments
@justinfung
- Yesterday's Super Bowl ads expose deeper underlying ways of thinking that we need to address. http://t.co/kSoj3kAc 18 hours ago
- I love this idea: "The Phone Stacking Game." http://t.co/uWstfb19 19 hours ago
- Can someone explain to me China and Russia's veto on Syria? Who does that?! 2 days ago
- Steamed custard buns. (cc @chaass) http://t.co/pY5aEQwq 2 days ago
- Deep in conversation. http://t.co/evDCGHve 2 days ago
recent posts
- Men, Women, and Super Bowl Ads
- Obama and me: a common journey
- Priorities
- Elmo and Love
- There is beauty in the world: Yosemite
- Faith and technology: who is in control?
- Pictorial: Three weeks in January
- I’m on Aslan’s side
- 2012: Two weeks in
- Mandela on Leadership